Social Media Companies Refuse to Support the Surveillance Bill in the Senate
Social media companies such as Google, Facebook, Yahoo, and Twitter have stated categorically that they will not support the current pending Senate legislation that would require these social media companies to notify federal authorities of any suspected terrorist activity, no matter how remote the possibility.
The government, on the other hand, claims that social media websites, and even social media news, have played a role in the expansion of terrorist groups’ influence, despite the fact that posting or promoting terrorist-related activities is prohibited under existing industry and government policies. In private meetings on Capitol Hill, social media website officials have informed lawmakers and congressional influencers that social media websites already prohibit any grisly content such as beheadings and other terrorist acts, including speeches, and that they immediately notify law enforcement if they suspect someone will be harmed as soon as the threat is made viable by a terrorist organization.
Why are social media companies refusing to support the Surveillance Bill in the Senate?
They are scared of being left out in the proverbial sun. Google is the largest social media company and will not join the majority in voting against the Surveillance Bill. Why is this? Because they want to continue to have their free ride as they funnel more of our private information to their gigantic search engine.
The powers that be are well aware that the largest players in the social media industry or social websites are also the ones who fund anti-NSA and anti-spyware websites on the internet, and they are taking action. Why do you think Facebook, Twitter, and other social media companies are afraid that the government will discover how much money they are making through these black hat operations? I don’t believe so, but it is for this reason that they are engaging in a very dangerous game. As if our personal information wasn’t already enough.
The reality is that the only people who are concerned about Americans’ privacy are members of the House Intelligence Committee and the Senate Intelligence Committee, respectively. Those in charge of the rest of the political power structure in Washington either can’t afford to lose their grip on power, or they want to continue employing these strategies to keep us on our toes. When it comes to our computer systems, no one is interested in what happens in the privacy of our own homes. Corporate America, on the other hand, is doing so, and they are doing so with their money. They will be forced to close their doors if they are unable to spy on you and your personal data any longer.
So, what is it about social media companies that makes them unwilling to support a solution to the problem? Otherwise, they will lose their credibility and be unable to maintain their position as the dominant force in the virtual world. Because these databases infringe on the privacy of the vast majority of people, most businesses will not even consider doing business with them.
However, this is a positive development for the average American citizen because it means that the invasion of privacy will now be limited to only members of Congress and heads of state. However, this is not the only issue that needs to be addressed. In addition, there are nine more that do not apply to every American citizen who makes use of social media. As a result, social media companies have a wealth of information about each and every American at their fingertips at any given time.
Some of this information includes everything you have written, said, or sent in an instant message, as well as information from your social media accounts either they are new social media accounts. This includes images and videos as well as a written description of the work. In addition to all of this information, social networking sites collect information about your whereabouts and what you do on a consistent basis. It is their goal to create detailed profiles of each and every one of their registered users. Not only do they have an endless amount of information about each user, but they have also gathered this information before the user has chosen to share it with others.
It goes without saying that the government does not want you to be aware of what they are up to as well. That is why the National Security Agency and other similar organizations were established in order to gather the same information. They want to catch people who are involved in illegal activities so that they can’t get away with it by fabricating evidence. Social media sites assist them in accomplishing this by providing users with real-time updates on their activities. However, while this may be beneficial to the government’s objectives, it is not necessarily beneficial to the individual’s private rights.
Unless social media companies are willing to share this information like they share social media articles, you can forget about free speech in the digital age. When it comes to what these social media platforms are doing to their users, there is absolutely nothing free about it. You have a right to know what information the social media company is holding about you, and you have a right to make certain that this information is shared with the individuals who need to know about this information. Last but not least, it is your responsibility to protect yourself and your family from this type of electronic monitoring.
The New Legislation Maybe Too Broad for Social Media Companies
Many industry experts and officials feel fear and worry that the proposed senate legislation on social media surveillance may be too broad and might put companies on the hook legally even if they unintentionally miss a tweet, video, or blog that hints at any terrorist attack. Another possible result would be a deluge of tips to law enforcement, making it harder for the government to sift through all that to find the more valuable and truthful information.
The biggest thorn and nightmare for social media websites will always be the 2013 event that was even broadcast through social media news when former government analyst Edward Snowden leaked details of a massive government surveillance program in many countries, some even allies of the U.S. Thus, social media and tech industry officials say that by law they had no choice but to supply consumer data and comply with gag orders that prevented companies from talking about it.
Many consumers and internet activists were furious after learning from the leaked details that many U.S. businesses actually allowed the government to spy on their customers, and even in some cases charging the government administrative fees to do so. This alone was reason enough for the social media and tech industry to lead an aggressive public push to limit surveillance requests and to increase government transparency in these aspects. The government instead needs to adopt its own sophisticated encryption techniques despite the Justice Department being against this due to past misconduct by such agencies as the NSA and CIA.
The Reality that Terrorists Still Use Social Media Companies is Still There However
In reality, most Islamic terrorist groups rely heavily on Twitter and Facebook were increasing social media traffic to recruit followers and militants have even posted beheading videos on social media news feeds and making them go viral for some time and copies before being taken down. Some groups even tweet the actions they are presently doing and thus, opening up new feeds on this topic.
It’s not a secret that many terror groups and their sponsors still use social media to recruit, fundraise and spread their messages. In fact, there is good news about that fact. That’s because technology is good at what it does and has been for a long time. We’re living in the age of the Internet as we have new social media traffic generation. It’s here to stay. So here’s a good fact: that terrorists use social networks to recruit, fundraise, communicate and recruit more terrorists.
You may be asking yourself why this makes any sense. And you’re right at first glance. It doesn’t, but it’s worth thinking about. The Internet is a tool, like a social networking site, a forum, or a search engine, that allows us to communicate and interact with other people worldwide.
Social networks provide an excellent platform for communication between people. That’s how they work. That’s what their purpose is. But they also allow fringe elements of human society to have an outlet for their communication as well. Many terrorist groups use this medium to recruit, fundraise and communicate with other terrorist groups. It’s a tool that everyone uses every day, and unfortunately, everyone can use it too.
To understand why this is a problem, you need to look closely at the current administration’s attempts to crack down on the use of social media. The federal government has been somewhat successful at stopping various online communication tools by terrorists and others. Unfortunately, that success has also brought about increased use online by the government’s very groups trying to stop.
In other words, the government can go after terrorists using the tremendous communication capabilities of the Internet, but it can never really control what terrorist groups are doing online. They have a messaging system that they use online to recruit, fundraise, and spread information. It is considered one of their more effective weapons against the US. The real challenge comes from groups or individuals who do not have an online messaging system. Because of that, the challenge is to go after their communication and disrupt their ability to use it.
We need to realize that this is the case because, as we have seen recently, there are many cases of individuals or small groups who take advantage of the fact that everyone has access to the Internet and use it for their purposes. In many cases, they gather enough information to justify the reasons they have for doing so. If social media tools are available online, the Internet will continue to be a tool of choice for terrorists to use in their communications.